Welcome to #37 of the Shift Age Newsletter! I offer up a very significant forecast about fossil fuels and energy. I also write about why I have not been surprised by the 2016 presidential campaign. I hope you enjoy everything in this issue and as always, welcome all the new subscribers since #36.

2015 will turn out to be the peak year of fossil fuel use. By 2020 it will be clear that the decline in consumption of fossil fuels began this year. It therefore will be the first year of flat to down fossil fuel emissions. This is a very significant event: the beginning of the end of the fossil fuel energy era.

The economic significance of this is monumental. We have seen a collapse in the price of oil. Short of a major catastrophe in Saudi Arabia - a possibility- we will never see $100 barrel oil again. I have forecast this and been saying this for the last year. The supply of oil is far outstripping demand. OPEC has lost its power to control price, there is a surplus of oil. Countries that have been relying on petroleum exports for their economy will have economic disruption. Many of these countries - think Middle East, Africa and Latin America- all have an abundance of sun and wind and will turn to them for their own energy rather than spending money on gas subsidies for their citizens.

This is occurring because of a convergence of short and long-term trends. The transportation and building sectors have become vastly more energy efficient than in 2000, or even 2010. The price of alternative and renewable energy has dropped dramatically in the last ten years and is now comparable in cost to fossil fuels as a source of electricity. There is a rapidly growing critical mass of people who fully see and understand the magnitude of climate change. This affects everything they do and buy. Climate change is directly tied to fossil fuel use.

This significant event will trigger a massive amount of change and change in perceptions. Once it is clear that fossil fuel usage is in decline, the financial sector will look at all fossil fuel companies differently. They will no longer be a good long-term investment. Unless they greatly increase dividend payments they will begin to be dropped from investment funds over the next decade. The key question for fossil fuel companies is how they think of themselves. If they think of themselves as coal, petroleum or gas companies they will enter into a long slow decline.

This of course harks back to more than a century ago when the railroad companies thought they were in the railroad not transportation business. This thinking kept them from entering the automotive or airline industries. If they had thought otherwise they might have funded the Wright Brothers or partnered with emerging automotive companies in Detroit.

The massive fossil fuel companies that dominate the Fortune Global 100 will soon have to make a choice. Do they move into the rapidly growing alternative and renewable energy sectors to keep growth rates up, or do they stay with the product mix they have and maintain profits through ever-greater efficiencies. With the price of oil down, probably permanently, the higher cost deep ocean exploration strategies will not be economically feasible to foster top line growth...

So 2015 will be an extremely significant year in the history of energy. Money will flow to solar and wind companies. Companies such as Tesla Motors and Tesla Energy will both have all the financial support they need and will spawn many other companies to enter the space. The transformative reality of new battery technology being able to store variable energy is the game changer. Optimism will begin to creep into thinking about climate change, that humanity can turn the corner and actually work to lessen the catastrophes rushing towards us.

Since 2010 I have been saying that 2010 -2020 will be the first decade of 21st century thought. This is the decade when legacy thinking falls away and the space is filled with new thinking of this century. Whatever you think when I say "20th century"- century of science, the century of world war, the American century- it began 1914-1918. WWI, the Russian Revolution, the General Theory of Relativity, the map of Europe as we know it and very unfortunately the map of the Middle East as defined by Europeans at that time. So all of the story lines of the 20th century began in its second decade. This is now happening for the 21st century.

So 2015, the middle of the Transformation Decade, will mark the beginning of the 21st century era of energy. The fossil fuel era of the last 200 years will give way to the new era of alternative and renewable energy. Of course there will be fossil fuel use for decades to come, but both in total output and usage, and in share of total energy consumption it will steadily decline. Just in time to face the stark and unprecedented realities of this new century.

In a recent column I wrote that I have not all been surprised by the developments in the early stages of the 2016 presidential campaign. I am not at all surprised by Trump, Carson, Sanders and the problems that Clinton is having.

In the spring of 2014 I started to get an interesting response to a line in my Power Point presentation "Entering the Shift Age". On a slide that covers several social, financial and cultural issues, I have a line "Politics and Governments". When this comes up, I have always said: "politics and governments are the single greatest thing holding back human evolution". So, early last year when I said these words I started getting spontaneous applause. Imagine 1,000 people in the audience and several hundred of them immediately started to applause with shouts of "absolutely!" "you got that right!". If this response was particularly robust, I then said something like: " a close second is mass media" which again got applause and shouts.

People in the United States are just sick and tired of a dysfunctional democracy and professional politicians whose only vision is to get elected and then re-elected. So Donald Trump and Ben Carson are leading because they represent the "none of the above" when confronted by the dull and boring politicians on the Republican side. On the Democratic side, people are responding strongly to Sanders as he is totally different and "telling it like it is", particularly in a country with growing wealth inequality. Clinton has come across as an entitled professional politician who gets to make her own rules, unlike the rest of us. Whoever came up with the optic of having her walk in a campaign parade surrounded by aides carrying a rope to keep people away are tone deaf to the sentiment of the American people.

Relative to the media part, it has been fun to watch all the talking heads on cable television shake their heads incomprehensively as to why all this is going on. It has pointed out that both the politicians and media in Washington and New York are co-dependently living in some bubble that is completely disconnected with what is going on in the country.

I have been often asked in recent years about the growing wealth inequality in America. One response is that when such inequality has occurred in history, there has been revolution, resistance or resurrection. ["Let them eat cake!"] Well this is being manifested by the populist messages coming from the leading candidates. Wealth inequality is a complex and huge issue in the world today. But is should come as no surprise, except for those living in bubbles, that the 2016 presidential election would have very strong populist themes and candidates.

Here is a link to that earlier column